This summer, stories about the presidential election — especially Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris — were dotted with allusions to Charli XCX’s album 'Brat'. From the Brat summer of Harris purportedly leading to an uptick in young voter support to the phenomenon also being covered in The Atlantic and Mother Jones, writers and reporters’ headlines, leads, and jokes coasted on memes and edits combining Harris interviews with 'Brat' songs. 

The candidate’s Bratification and its echoes in journalism are a rhetorical appeal to young people who have driven the trend of Brat summer past TikTok and X into semi-popular vernacular. But recent polling that shows young people are most concerned about the economy, namely housing, and the continued U.S. support of Israel despite widespread disapproval. This type of coverage serves as a paltry shortcut to gain clicks without providing substantive critique or accountability coverage. It allows those politicians to get away with using rhetoric, not substantive policy, to connect with young people.

Politicians aren’t celebrities. They’re hired to serve the public, not to entertain, unless that extends to the political theater of unfulfilled promises. We need to trust and respect young people enough to give them headlines that reflect how politicians’ choices bear out on their lives and the issues they care about, not to regurgitate memes. What makes elections reporting useful isn’t covering politicians as celebrities, no matter how they get remixed into digital memes later co-opted by communications teams. It’s highlighting how proposed platforms align — or don’t — with the priorities of different communities. 

Journalists aren’t paparazzi. Our job is to rigorously fact-check and hold up to the light said promises, especially how they impact the most marginalized. Young people face a landscape with accelerating climate change, decreasing access to reproductive rights, transphobic legislation, a dismal job market, and consistently rising rents, not to mention the Biden administration’s refusal to stop sending funds to Israel while it scraps the program providing free COVID-19 vaccines to uninsured people. Coverage should reflect that.

So what can be done instead? Movement journalism might be part of the answer. The term, popularized by a Project South report in 2017, (though in action for much longer), alludes to the practicing journalism with an eye toward “people coming together to build the power of all people to collectively control the conditions of our lives and our communities,” report author and journalist Anna Simonton writes. This kind of journalism can provide a political reporting frame that underscores young people’s agency and offers the kind of political education, answers, and resources that can’t be found through generative AI tools meant to stand in as fact-checkers. 

Last week, fourteen grassroots-aligned organizations — spanning movement journalism newsrooms including Prism, Scalawag, and In These Times — announced their formation of the Movement Media Alliance, “committed to accurate, transparent, accountable, principled, and just media.” 

Not every publication may be receptive to the idea of movement media — especially those still married to the myth of objectivity and the idea that detachment from community is possible — but every journalist can commit to asking questions aligned with those principles, and turn to the Movement Media Alliance as an affirmation that other kinds of political reporting premised on rigor, respect, and trust in young people can and do exist.

— James Salanga

Introducing a new chapter for The Objective: After over four years of The Objective being an all-volunteer organization, thanks to our members and our first major grant, $50,000, from Borealis Philanthropy, co-directors Gabe Schneider and James Salanga are now working part-time. The Objective hopes to eventually be able to pay freelancers $1 a word while continuing to publish accountability reporting that shows an alternative way to do journalism. Read the story in The Objective.  

Your editor said what? Let us know: The Objective is still collecting quotes from newsroom workers about the micro- and macroaggressions they’ve heard in the workplace. These will be anonymously published, without attribution or identifying information, as part of a forthcoming Instagram project, and we’ll continue to leave this survey open for anyone who wants to share. Complete the survey via The Objective. 

Northwestern journalism professor Dr. Steven Thrasher suspended for participating in Palestine solidarity protests: The chair of social justice reporting at the university is under investigation by the university, which filed and later dropped charges against Thrasher for “obstructing police” while protecting students from arrest at Palestine solidarity protests in the spring. He spoke with Amy Goodman at Democracy Now about applying the same social justice journalism principles to Palestine as he has to covering race, LGBTQ+ people, COVID, and HIV. Read the Q&A in Democracy Now and a 2022 Q&A Thrasher did with The Objective.  

Votebeat builds Slack for reporters to ask burning election questions: Starting October 14, up to 15 volunteer elections experts — including former officials, tech experts, and election law scholars — will be assembled into an “Expert Desk” Slack channel. They’ll be on call to answer any questions reporters have about election communications, with Votebeat editorial director Jennifer Huseman participating as the moderator. Read the story on MuckRock.

Civil Eats removes its paywall: In honor of its 15th anniversary, the award-winning nonprofit newsroom, which covers the relationship between food, society, and politics, received support from two separate funders to remove its paywall for the next year. Civil Eats implemented a paywall in 2015 for financial support, and is now asking for members to help support non-paywalled news beyond the initial year of support. Read the story in Civil Eats.

New survey seeks to survey diversity in environmental journalism: The survey, conducted by Green 2.0 and the Society of Environmental Journalists, are looking to determine the demographics of U.S. newsrooms covering climate, environment, and energy stories, and to analyze the experiences of environmental journalists of color. Outlets and individuals can both respond. Participate via the Green 2.0 site.

Looking for a job? Here are a few places to look: INN | ONA | JournalismJobs.com | 10 Jobs and a Dog | NABJ | AAJA | NAHJ | NLGJA | Trans Journalists Association | West Coast Media Jobs | @WritersofColor | MEO Jobs | Freelance Journalist Rates | Source Jobs | Opportunities of the Week ($)

How about a style guide? Trans Journalists Association | Diversity Style Guide | Tribal Nations Media Guide | NABJ Style Guide | Disability Language Style Guide | AAJA Style Guide | NAHJ Cultural Competence Handbook | SPJ Race & Gender Hotline | AMEJA Media Resource Guide | The Press in Prison | The Conscious Style Guide | Reporting on Addiction | Religion and Spirituality (Language, Please)

Thanks for reading our newsletter. We appreciate you being here, and we’ll have more for you soon.

— 30 —